This page is reserved for client feedback and professional recognition that CSDA can verify and is authorised to publish. Confidential case details and unsupported performance claims are excluded.
Publication standard
Testimonials should identify whether the reviewer has consented to publication, while removing unnecessary case facts. Awards should name the issuing organisation, title and year and should link to an independent record where available.
No award, testimonial, rating or success percentage should be added solely for promotion. Evidence must be retained so a visitor can understand who issued the recognition and what it represents.
Feedback and recognition questions
What evidence may be published on this page?+
Only material that can be verified and lawfully published, such as an award issuer's public record or a testimonial for which the client has given permission.
Why are client identities normally withheld?+
Investigation matters are sensitive. Names, case details and identifying facts should not be published unless disclosure is necessary, lawful and expressly authorised.
Does CSDA publish a success-rate percentage?+
No verified success-rate percentage is claimed. Outcomes depend on the facts, available sources, lawful methods and limitations of each assignment.
How many assignments does CSDA report?+
CSDA reports exactly 9,018 handled assignments across 21 years of operation.
